Processor Comparison Table
Posted by BA on May 4, 2010 in Intel | 116 comments
Intel Processor Comparison – Part 16 of 16
The table below compares a few processors both form Core i as well as Core 2 technologies by Intel. This article is part of a series of articles listed below
- Intel Processor Comparison – Introduction
- Want a faster PC, get more RAM first
- Processor Flashback
- Hyper Threading Technology
- Difference between Thread and Process
- Difference between Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad
- Difference Between Core 2 Duo and Core i3
- Difference Between Core 2 Quad and Core i5
- Intel Turbo Boost Technology
- Difference Between Core i3 and Core i5
- Difference Between Core i5 and Core i7
- Differences Between Core 2 and Core i Technologies
- Difference Between FSB and DMI
- Difference Between Smart Cache and L2 Cache
- Processor Comparison Bottom Line
- Processor Comparison Table
Processor Comparison Table
| Name | Intel® Core™2 Quad Processor Q9400 (6M Cache, 2.66 GHz, 1333 MHz FSB) | Intel® Core™ i3-540 Processor (4M Cache, 3.06 GHz) | Intel® Core™ i5-750 Processor (8M Cache, 2.66 GHz) | Intel® Core™ i7-860 Processor (8M Cache, 2.80 GHz) | Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor E8600 (6M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 1333 MHz FSB) |
| Code Name | Yorkfield | Clarkdale | Lynnfield | Lynnfield | Wolfdale |
| Status | Launched | Launched | Launched | Launched | Launched |
| Launch Date | Q3’08 | Q1’10 | Q3’09 | Q3’09 | Q3’08 |
| Processor Number | Q9400 | i3-540 | i5-750 | i7-860 | E8600 |
| # of Cores | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| # of Threads | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 2 |
| Clock Speed | 2.66 GHz | 3.06 GHz | 2.66 GHz | 2.8 GHz | 3.33 GHz |
| Max Turbo Frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.46 GHz | |||
| Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| Bus/Core Ratio | 8 | 23 | 20 | 21 | 10 |
| Bus Type | FSB | DMI | DMI | DMI | FSB |
| System Bus | 1333 MHz | 2.5 GT/s | 2.5 GT/s | 2.5 GT/s | 1333 MHz |
| FSB Parity | No | No | |||
| Instruction Set | 64-bit | 64-bit | 64-bit | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| Instruction Set Extensions | SSE4.2 | SSE4.2 | SSE4.2 | ||
| Embedded Options Available | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Supplemental SKU | No | No | No | No | No |
| Lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm | 45 nm | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Max TDP | 95 W | 73 W | 95 W | 95 W | 65 W |
| VID Voltage Range | 0.8500v-1.3625v | 0.6500V-1.4000V | 0.6500V-1.4000V | 0.6500V-1.4000V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
| 1ku Bulk Budgetary Price | $183.00 | $133.00 | $196.00 | $284.00 | $266.00 |
| Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type) |
16 GB | 16 GB | 16 GB | ||
| Memory Types | DDR3-1066/1333 | DDR3-1066/1333 | DDR3-1066/1333 | ||
| # of Memory Channels | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Max Memory Bandwidth | 21 GB/s | 21 GB/s | 21 GB/s | ||
| Physical Address Extensions | 36-bit | 36-bit | 36-bit | ||
| ECC Memory Supported | No | ||||
| Integrated Graphics | Yes | No | No | ||
| Intel® HD Graphics | Yes | ||||
| Graphics Base Frequency | 733 MHz | ||||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | Yes | ||||
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technology | Yes | ||||
| Dual Display Capable | Yes | ||||
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | ||
| PCI Express Configurations | 1×16, 2×8 | 1×16, 2×8 | 1×16, 2×8 | ||
| # of PCI Express Ports | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Max CPU Configuration | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| TCASE | 71.4°C | 72.6°C | 72.7°C | 72.4°C | |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm | 45 nm | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Processing Die Size | 164 mm2 | 81 mm2 | 296 mm2 | 296 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| # of Processing Die Transistors | 456 million | 382 million | 774 million | 774 million | 410 million |
| Graphics and IMC Lithography | 45 nm | ||||
| Graphics and IMC Die Size | 114 mm2 | ||||
| # of Graphics and IMC Die Transistors | 177 million | ||||
| Sockets Supported | LGA775 | FCLGA1156 | LGA1156 | LGA1156 | LGA775 |
| Halogen Free Options Available | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | No | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| AES New Instructions | No | No | No | No | No |
| Intel® 64 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Idle States | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enhanced Intel® Speedstep Technology | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | No | No | No | No | No |
| Thermal Monitoring Technologies | Yes | No | No | No | Yes |
| Execute Disable Bit | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Difference between Core 2 Technology vs Core i Technology
Posted by BA on May 4, 2010 in Intel | 1 comment
Intel Processor Comparison – Part 12 of 16
Intel Core 2 Quad and Core 2 Duo technology have some more differences as compared to Intel’s Core i3, i5 and i7 technologies. Core 2 technology supports L2 cache while Core iX processors run Intel Smart Cache technology. Similarly, architectural change in bus architecture is also a difference. Core 2 processors use FSB (Front Side Bus) while Core i processors use Intel Smart Cache.
This article is part of a series of articles listed below
- Intel Processor Comparison – Introduction
- Want a faster PC, get more RAM first
- Processor Flashback
- Hyper Threading Technology
- Difference between Thread and Process
- Difference between Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad
- Difference Between Core 2 Duo and Core i3
- Difference Between Core 2 Quad and Core i5
- Intel Turbo Boost Technology
- Difference Between Core i3 and Core i5
- Difference Between Core i5 and Core i7
- Differences Between Core 2 and Core i Technologies
- Difference Between FSB and DMI
- Difference Between Smart Cache and L2 Cache
- Processor Comparison Bottom Line
- Processor Comparison Table
Difference Between Core i5 and Core i7
Posted by BA on May 4, 2010 in Intel | 14 comments
Intel Processor Comparison – Part 11 of 16
Am I getting redundant here? Not really. Intel Core i5 is a quad core processor that can run four processes at a time, while each process can run only one thread. While Intel Core i7 can run four processes and eight threads at the same time on its four cores. So you can say that Core i5 has uni-threaded four cores, while Core i7 is a quad core processor with each core running hyper threading technology.
This article is part of a series of articles listed below
- Intel Processor Comparison – Introduction
- Want a faster PC, get more RAM first
- Processor Flashback
- Hyper Threading Technology
- Difference between Thread and Process
- Difference between Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad
- Difference Between Core 2 Duo and Core i3
- Difference Between Core 2 Quad and Core i5
- Intel Turbo Boost Technology
- Difference Between Core i3 and Core i5
- Difference Between Core i5 and Core i7
- Differences Between Core 2 and Core i Technologies
- Difference Between FSB and DMI
- Difference Between Smart Cache and L2 Cache
- Processor Comparison Bottom Line
- Processor Comparison Table
Intel Turbo Boost Technolog
Posted by BA on May 4, 2010 in Intel | 0 comments
Intel Processor Comparison – Part 9 of 16
Intel Turbo boost technology is a smart way of over clocking the processors. Gamers and enthusiasts around the globe have been using tricks to overclock their processors to get better speeds. This fact has become so popular that Intel has included Turbo Boost as their native feature. Whenever the processor is over loaded and reached its 100% processing limit, Intel Turbo Boost tehcnology comes into play. It increases the processor’s core frequency by 133 MHz after random and frequent intervals. The processor frequency continues to increase till the upper limit for the processor Turbo is reached. The upper limit is the maximum overclocking frequency that is allowed by Intel. You may end up frying your processor if you dont stop there.
This article is part of a series of articles listed below
- Intel Processor Comparison – Introduction
- Want a faster PC, get more RAM first
- Processor Flashback
- Hyper Threading Technology
- Difference between Thread and Process
- Difference between Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad
- Difference Between Core 2 Duo and Core i3
- Difference Between Core 2 Quad and Core i5
- Intel Turbo Boost Technology
- Difference Between Core i3 and Core i5
- Difference Between Core i5 and Core i7
- Differences Between Core 2 and Core i Technologies
- Difference Between FSB and DMI
- Difference Between Smart Cache and L2 Cache
- Processor Comparison Bottom Line
- Processor Comparison Table
Intel – Processor Flashback
Posted by BA on May 4, 2010 in Intel | 0 comments
Processor Comparison – Part 3 of 16
Most of us have been using those good old single core processors. Then Intel came up with their dual core technology. Dual core means, you have physically two processors that are soldered together into one microprocessor. They work independently and you actually have two processors working in your computer.
Then came a wave of processors including Cor 2 Quad, Core i3, Core i5 and Core i7 that people started losing clue of, how exactly these processors are better than the typical Core 2 duo. There are technical architectural level changes that we may not be able to discuss, and those who are interested in a detailed comparison, can go through the table at the bottom of this post. But we will discuss the main changes in this post.
This article is part of a series of articles listed below
- Intel Processor Comparison – Introduction
- Want a faster PC, get more RAM first
- Processor Flashback (This Page)
- Hyper Threading Technology
- Difference between Thread and Process
- Difference between Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad
- Difference Between Core 2 Duo and Core i3
- Difference Between Core 2 Quad and Core i5
- Intel Turbo Boost Technology
- Difference Between Core i3 and Core i5
- Difference Between Core i5 and Core i7
- Differences Between Core 2 and Core i Technologies
- Difference Between FSB and DMI
- Difference Between Smart Cache and L2 Cache
- Processor Comparison Bottom Line
- Processor Comparison Table
